Assessing total body protein, mineral, and bone mineral content from total body water and body density. Siconolfi, Steven F., Randal J. Gretebeck, William W. Wong. Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Space Biomedical Research Institute SD5/Space Biomedical Research Institute, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 Houston, TX 77058, Voice: (713) 483-7110, FAX (713) 483-6227, University Space Research Association, Space Center Drive, Houston, TX 77058, Stable Isotope Program, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates Street, Houston, TX 77030
APStracts 2:0300A, 1995.
We hypothesized that investigators could assess bone mineral content (BMC), total body mineral (M), and protein (P) from body water (W) and density (Db) based on Siri's (15, 16) theory for body composition analysis. Siri used one or more of the body components and the densities of the body, fat (F), W, M, and P to estimate one of the remaining fractional masses. We compared M, BMC, P, F, and FFM in 31 subjects (15F/16M) computed from measures of W and Db with (4C model) and without (3C model) BMC (from dual x-ray absorptiometry). 4C-P was calculated by difference (P=FFM-W-M). Mean difference (p&GT0.05) ranged from 0.1 to 0.8%. Correlations (+/-SEE%) between 4C and 3C values were significant (M r=0.907+/-8.8%, BMC r=0.907+/-8.7%, P r=0.969+/-6.6%, F r=0.998+/-2.0%, and FFM r=0.999+/-0.7%). We concluded that investigators can assess M, BMC, and P from W and Db.

Received 2 November 1994; accepted in final form 15 June 1995.
APS Manuscript Number A1125-4.
Article publication pending Journal of Applied Physiology.
ISSN 1080-4757 Copyright 1995 The American Physiological Society.
Published in APStracts on 18 July 1995.