Enhancement of signal quality in esophageal recordings of diaphragm emg. Sinderby, Christer A., Jennifer C. Beck, Lars H. Lindstr[diaeresis]om,and Alejandro E. Grassino,. Meakins Christie Laboratories, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Notre Dame Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Spinal Injuries Unit, Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of G[diaeresis]oteborg, G[diaeresis]oteborg, Sweden, and Department of Medical Information Processing, Sahlgrenska Hospital, G[diaeresis]oteborg, Sweden
APStracts 3:0576A, 1996.
The crural diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) is recorded from a sheet of muscle whose fiber direction is mostly perpendicular to an esophageal bipolar electrode. The region from which the action potentials are elicited, the electrically active region of the diaphragm (EARdi), and the center of this region, the EARdi center, may vary during voluntary contractions, in terms of their position with respect to an esophageal electrode. Depending on the bipolar electrode's position with respect to the EARdi center, the EMGdi is filtered to different degrees. The objectives of the present study were to reduce these filtering effects on the diaphragm EMG by developing an analysis algorithm referred to as the "double subtraction technique". The results showed that changes in the position of the EARdi center by +/-5 mm with respect to the electrode pairs located 10 mm caudal and 10 mm cephalad, provided a systematic variation in the EMG power spectrum center frequency values by +/ -10%. The double subtraction technique reduced the influence of movement of the EARdi center relative to the electrode array on EMG power spectrum center frequency and root mean square values, increased the signal to noise ratio by 2 dB, and increased the number of EMG samples that were accepted by the signal qulity indices by 50 percent.

Received 12 June 1996; accepted in final form 29 November 1996.
APS Manuscript Number A550-6.
Article publication pending Journal of Applied Physiology.
ISSN 1080-4757 Copyright 1996 The American Physiological Society.
Published in APStracts on 31 December 1996