Density of the fat-free mass and estimates of body composition in
male weight trainers.
Modlesky, Christopher M., Kirk J. Cureton, Richard D. Lewis, Barry M.
Prior, Mark A. Sloniger, and David A. Rowe.
Departments of Exercise Science and Foods and Nutrition, University
of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
APStracts 3:0042A, 1996.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the assumed density
and composition of the FFM, and estimates of %Fat from body density
using the Siri equation (%Fatd) are valid in weight trainers with
high musculoskeletal development. Measures of body density by
underwater weighing (Db), body water by deuterium dilution, and bone
mineral by whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were obtained
in young white men, 14 weight trainers with high musculoskeletal
development and 14 non-weight-training controls with average
musculoskeletal development. %Fatd was significantly higher (p=.05)
than %Fat estimated from body density, water and mineral (%Fatd,w,m)
using a four-component model in weight trainers (17.3 +/- 4.6 vs 13.2
+/- 5.1%), but not in controls (14.8 +/- 3.1 vs 14.2 +/- 3.6%). The
greater discrepancy between %Fatd and %Fatd,w,m was explained by
lower Dffm in weight trainers (1.089+/- 0.005 g/cc) than in controls
(1.099 +/- 0.007g/cc). The lower Dffm in the weight trainers was due
to higher water (74.8 +/-1.2 vs 72.6 +/- 2.0%), and lower mineral
(5.3 +/- 0.6 vs 5.9 +/- 0.4%) and protein (19.9 +/-1.4 vs 21.5 +/-
1.9%) fractions of the FFM. We conclude that in young white men with
high musculoskeletal development, Dffm is lower than the assumed
value of 1.1 g/cc and %Fat is overestimated from Db using the Siri
equation.
Received 26 July 1995; accepted in final form 5 January 1996.
APS Manuscript Number A817-5.
Article publication pending Journal of Applied Physiology.
ISSN 1080-4757 Copyright 1996 The American Physiological Society.
Published in APStracts on 25 January 96