Neuroscience
Online

Section I:
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology


1. Resting Potentials and Action Potentials
Part 2 of 2

John H. Byrne, Ph.D.

go to the index of termsgo to lecture 2, part 1go to the table of contentsgo to the home pagego to lecture 1, part 1Ionic Mechanisms of Resting Potentials

Before examining the ionic mechanisms of action potentials, it is first necessary to understand the ionic mechanisms of the resting potential. The two phenomena are intimately related. The story of the resting potential goes back to the early 1900's when Julius Bernstein suggested that the resting potential (Vm) was equal to the potassium equilibrium potential (EK). Where

The key to understanding the resting potential is the fact that ions are distributed unequally on the inside and outside of cells, and that cell membranes are selectively permeable to different ions. K+ is particularly important for the resting potential. The membrane is highly permeable to K+. In addition, the inside of the cell has a high concentration of K+ ([K+]i) and the outside of the cell has a low concentration of K+ ([K+]o). Thus, K+ will naturally move by diffusion from its region of high concentration to its region of low concentration. Consequently, the positive K+ ions leaving the inner surface of the membrane leave behind some negatively charged ions. That negative charge attracts the positive charge of the K+ ion that is leaving and tends to "pull it back". Thus, there will be an electrical force directed inward that will tend to counterbalance the diffusional force directed outward. Eventually, an equilibrium will be established; the concentration force moving K+ out will balance the electrical force holding it in. The potential at which that balance is achieved is called the Nernst Equilibrium Potential.

Figure 1.4

An experiment to test Bernstein's hypothesis that the membrane potential is equal to the Nernst Equilibrium Potential (i.e., Vm = EK) is illustrated to the left.

The K+ concentration outside the cell was systematically varied while the membrane potential was measured. Also shown is the line that is predicted by the Nernst Equation. The experimentally measured points are very close to this line. Moreover, because of the logarithmic relationship in the Nernst equation, a change in concentration of K+ by a factor of 10 results in a 60 mV change in potential. 

Note, however, that there are some deviations in the figure at left from what is predicted by the Nernst equation. Thus, one cannot conclude that Vm = EK. Such deviations indicate that another ion is also involved in generating the resting potential. That ion is Na+. The high concentration of Na+ outside the cell and relatively low concentration inside the cell results in a chemical (diffusional) driving force for Na+ influx. There is also an electrical driving force because the inside of the cell is negative and this negativity attracts the positive sodium ions. Consequently, if the cell has a small permeability to sodium, Na+ will move across the membrane and the membrane potential would be more depolarized than would be expected from the K+ equilibrium potential. 

Goldman-Hodgkin and Katz (GHK) Equation

When a membrane is permeable to two different ions, the Nernst equation can no longer be used to precisely determine the membrane potential. It is possible, however, to apply the GHK equation. This equation describes the potential across a membrane that is permeable to both Na+ and K+.

Note that is the ratio of Na+ permeability (PNa) to K+ permeability (PK). Note also that if the permeability of the membrane to Na+ is 0, then alpha in the GHK is 0, and the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation reduces to the Nernst equilibrium potential for K+. If the permeability of the membrane to Na+ is very high and the potassium permeability is very low, the [Na+] terms become very large, dominating the equation compared to the [K+] terms, and the GHK equation reduces to the Nernst equilibrium potential for Na+.
If the GHK equation is applied to the same data in Figure 1.4, there is a much better fit. The value of alpha needed to obtain this good fit was 0.01. This means that the potassium K+ permeability is 100 times the Na+ permeability. In summary, the resting potential is due not only to the fact that there is a high permeability to K+. There is also a slight permeability to Na+, which tends to make the membrane potential slightly more positive than it would have been if the membrane were permeable to K+ alone. 

Figure 1.5

Membrane Potential Laboratory

Click here to go to the interactive Membrane Potential Laboratory to experiment with the effects of altering external or internal potassium ion concentration and membrane permeability to sodium and potassium ions. Predictions are made using the Nernst and the Goldman, Hodgkin, Katz equations.

Membrane Potential Laboratory

Test Your Knowledge

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change This answer is INCORRECT.

A change in permeability would depolarize the membrane potential since alpha in the GHK equation would equal one. Initially, alpha was 0.01. Try substituting different values of alpha into the GHK equation and calculate the resultant membrane potential.

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential This answer is INCORRECT.

The membrane potential would approach the K+ equilibrium potential only if the Na+ permeability was decreased or the K+ permeability was increased. Also there would be no "new" equilibrium potential. Changing the permeability does not change the equilibrium potential.

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential This answer is INCORRECT.

The membrane potential would approach the Na+ equilibrium potential only if alpha in the GHK equation became very large (e.g., decrease PK or increase PNa). Also, there would be no "new" Na+ equilibrium potential. Changing the permeability does not change the equilibrium potential; it changes the membrane potential.

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV This answer is CORRECT!

Roughly speaking, the membrane potential would move to a value half way between EK and ENa. The GHK equation could be used to determine the precise value.

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV

If a nerve membrane suddenly became equally permeable to both Na+ and K+, the membrane potential would:

A. Not change

B. Approach the new K+ equilibrium potential

C. Approach the new Na+ equilibrium potential

D. Approach a value of about 0 mV

E. Approach a constant value of about +55 mV This answer is INCORRECT.

The membrane potential would not approach a value of about +55 mV (the approximate value of ENa) unless there was a large increase in the sodium permeability without a corresponding change in the potassium permeability. Alpha in the Goldman equation would need to approach a very high value.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV

E. An action potential would be initiated

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative This answer is INCORRECT.

The normal value of extracellular potassium is 20 mM and the normal value of intracellular potassium is 400 mM, yielding a normal equilibrium potential for potassium of about -75 mV. If the intracellular concentration is changed from 400 mM to 200 mM, then the potassium equilibrium potential as determined by the Nernst equation, will equal about -60 mV. Since the membrane potential is normally -60 mV and is dependent, to a large extent, on EK, the change in the potassium concentrationand hence EK would make the membrane potential more positive, not more negative.

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV

E. An action potential would be initiated

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV This answer is INCORRECT.

The potassium equilibrium potential would not change by 60 mV. The potassium concentration was changed just from 400 mM to 200 mM. One can use the Nernst equation to determine the exact value that the equilibrium potential would change by. It was initially about -75 mV and as a result of the change in concentration, the equilibrium potential becomes -60 mV. Thus, the equilibrium potential does not change by 60 mV, it changes by about 15 mV.

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV

E. An action potential would be initiated

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV This answer is CORRECT!

This is the correct answer. See the logic described in responses A and B.

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV

E. An action potential would be initiated

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV This answer is INCORRECT.

Using the Nernst equation, the new potassium equilibrium potential can be calculated to be -60 mV. A value of -18 mV would be calculated if you substituted [K]o = 200 and [K]i= 400 into the Nernst equation.

E. An action potential would be initiated

If the concentration of K+ in the cytoplasm of an invertebrate axon is changed to a new value of 200 mM (Note: for this axon normal [K]o = 20 mM and normal [K]i = 400 mM): 

A. The membrane potential would become more negative

B. The K+ equilibrium potential would change by 60 mV

C. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -60 mV

D. The K+ equilibrium potential would be about -18 mV

E. An action potential would be initiated This answer is INCORRECT.

The membrane potential would not depolarize sufficiently to reach threshold (about -45 mV).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


User survey button

Contact the author(s) at: nba_course@uth.tmc.edu
Copyright © 1997-present, All Rights Reserved
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Created through the Multimedial Scriptorium - Academic Technology