Face &Mandible

INTRODUCTION

The face, sometimes called the “midface,” includes those structures bounded by the superior orbital ridges (including the frontal sinuses) and orbital roofs to the free margin of the lesser sphenoidal wings, superiorly; the lateral orbital rims, malar eminences, anterior walls of the maxillary antra, and the maxillary alveolar processes, anteriorly; the hard palate inferiorly; the anterolateral and posterolateral antral walls, the lateral wall of the zygomatic recess and the zygomatic arch, laterally; and the posterior walls of the antra and apices of the orbital cones, posteriorly.


The pterygoid process of the sphenoid bones are actually part of the skull, but, because they are frequently injured in major facial trauma, are commonly considered part of the midface.

Conventional radiography is the initial imaging modality of nontraumatic and traumatic conditions of the face because it is universally available, quickly obtained, an excellent screening examination that provides comprehensive assessment of the face, is highly sensitive and specific for facial pathology, and is economical.

Conventional radiography should precede facial CT in all instances even in the presence of massive facial trauma for the reasons stated above.

Radiography of the pediatric face provides primarily assessment of the facial skeleton.  The redundant mucosa in the developing paranasal sinuses makes the radiographic assessment of “sinusitis” in infants and young children essentially impossible.  Pediatric blunt facial injuries are uncommon to rare.

The radiographic examination of the non-traumatized face should be obtained with the patient erect and all frontal projections with the central-beam posterior-to-anterior (PA).  In patients with facial trauma, other than isolated to the nose, the examination should be obtained with the patient supine and the lateral radiograph obtained with a horizontal beam in order to detect air-fluid levels. Because of positioning required for the Waters, extended Towne, and submentovertical projections, the cervical spine must have been previously "cleared." In the presence of a cervical collar, modified frontal projections may be obtained by x-ray tube angulation.

Note: Facial series must be reviewed by the radiologist prior to additional imaging.

The viewer is again reminded that this Primer is not intended to replace standard references regarding the face such as [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

 

NOSE

Routine Views

 

A.  Supine Waters View
B.  Each lateral.  SOFT TISSUE TECHNIQUE

 On the frontal projection, the small, thin nasal bones, being superimposed upon the nasal process of the maxillae, typically are not visible.  The nasal bones and nasal processes of the maxilla form the lateral walls of the nostrils.  This projection also shows the midline nasal septum composed of the superimposed perpendicular plate of the ethmoid, the vomer, and the septal cartilage.  The hard palate forms the floor of each nostril.  The superior, middle, and inferior conchae arise from the lateral wall of each nostril.  Usually, only the middle and inferior are visible on frontal projections of the nose or face.

 The lateral projection of the nose shows the nasion, nasal bones, nasal process and the nasal spine of the maxilla.  The nasion is the junction of the nasal and frontal bones.  The nasal bones are superior and anterior to the nasal process of the maxilla and separated from the latter by the nasomaxillary suture.  The plane of inclination of the dorsum of the nose and of the naso-maxillary suture are similar as are the faint lucencies between the two called nasociliary grooves for vessels and nerves.  Nasal bone fractures are typically perpendicular to the plane of these normal structures.  The nasal spine of the maxilla projects anteriorly from the junction of the alveolar process and hard palate at the insertion of the base of the soft tissue septum and upper lip.

 

CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY


Routine Examination (Facial Series)

The routine examination of the face includes the Caldwell, straight AP, Waters, extended Towne, lateral, and submentovertical projections. Multiple examinations in the frontal projection are necessary to ensure that the skeletal structures of the middle and posterior cranial fossa are projected off the facial skeleton on at least one radiograph. Stated differently, if any component of the facial skeleton is not visible on any given frontal projection, it will be visible on another. The Waters projection provides the most comprehensive demonstration of the facial skeleton.

The Caldwell view is characterized by the petrous pyramids projecting through the orbits. The advantages of the Caldwell view are that it clearly shows the superior orbital rims, the intervening nasion, the superior portions of the medial and lateral orbital rims, the innominate line and lesser sphenoid wings, the planum sphenoidale and, 1 cm caudad, the floor of the sphenoidal sinus, and the anterolateral walls of the antra ("friendly lines"). Its limitations are that the petrous pyramids invariably obscure the inferior orbital rims and floor and the malar eminences. The zygomatic arches are rarely visable on the Caldwell view.

The antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of the face, in which the petrous pyramids and occiput are superimposed upon the inferior orbital rims and maxillary antra, provides excellent visualization of the superior portions of the medial and lateral orbital rims, including the zygomaticofrontal suture, the superior orbital rim and fissure, the innominate lines (greater sphenoidal wing), and lesser sphenoidal wings, the nasion, the ethmoidal and frontal sinuses, and planum sphenoidale. Limitations of this view are obscuration of the inferior orbital rims and floor, maxillary antra (including the "friendly line"), and malar eminence.

Understanding the relationship of the posteromedial-most aspect of the orbital floor to the inferior orbital rim as seen on the AP & Waters projections is critical to accurate radiologic interpretation. The importance of this relationship lies in the identification of each, the projection-related alteration of this relationship, and the similarity of the normal anatomy to the conventional radiographic signs of a floor blowout fracture. On the straight AP radiograph of the face (Fig. postmed01), the thin, convex bony density in the inferomedial aspect of the orbit is the posteromedial-most aspect of the orbital floor covering the maxillary antrum or an anomalous ethmoidal air cell. The normal variation in the appearance of this structure can be seen by comparing the right and left orbits. The medial aspect of the inferior orbital rim, which is continuous with the inferior orbital rim laterally and the medial orbital wall medially, lies inferior to the posteromedial floor arc.

In changing position from the AP to the Waters projection the head rotates posteriorly on a mid coronal plane which causes the posteromedial floor arc to move inferiorly and the inferior orbital rim superiorly (Fig. wtrs03). On the Waters projection, the floor arc may be misinterpreted as the inferior rim and the latter misinterpreted as a blowout fragment. The inferior orbital foramen, being intrinsic to the inferior rim unequivocally identifies the inferior rim.

The Waters projection, obtained with the neck extended so that the petrous pyramids and occiput are superimposed on the maxillary alveolar process or lower, provides the most comprehensive view of the facial skeleton. With proper radiographic technique and adequate positioning, the Waters projection has as its only limitation inconsistent demonstration of the zygomatic arches.

The extended Towne projection is obtained with the neck flexed and the central beam angulated approximately 35 degrees caudally and centered at the frontoparietal junction. Its principle advantage lies in showing the maxillary antra in a slightly oblique craniocaudad projection (Fig. town01) so that the continuity and configuration of the posterior, lateral, and anterior walls of the antra are clearly evident. The posterolateral wall of the antra may normally be smoothly convex, as in Fig. town01, or undulating. This projection also shows the sphenomaxillary fissure which is the continuum from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the inferior orbital fissure, the base of the greater sphenoidal wing, the ascending ramus, neck, and frequently the condyle of the mandible, as well as the zygomatic arch. Display of the antrum on the Towne projection (Fig. town01) explains the common appearance of the antrum as seen on the AP projection (Fig. wtrs03 ) in which the lateral 1/3 of the antrum, being more dense than the medial 2/3, could be misinterpreted as mucus membrane thickening or a submucosal hematoma. The shorter AP diameter, and air column of the zygomatic recess, compared to that of the body of the sinus cavity (Fig. town01) causes the density of the lateral 1/3 of the sinus to be greater than the body.

The extended Towne view is not designed to show the orbits, ethmoid sinuses, nor cranio-facial region.

The submentovertical ("jug-handle") projection is made, as its name indicates, with the central beam passing from the submental area to the vertex of the skull. Its primary purpose is to show the zygomatic arches in sagittal projection. The arches are normally convex. The zygomaticotemporal suture, normally present in the mid-portion of the arch, may be visible as a smooth, short alteration in contour of the arch. Occasionally, the anterior wall of the antra, the malar eminence, the lateral rim of the orbit and the lateral orbital and posterolateral antral walls may be visable on this projection.

The lateral projection of the face shows the orbital roofs, floors, and lateral rims, the pterygoid bones, posterior antral walls and the interposed pterygomaxillary fissure, the margins of the zygomatic recesses, the hard palate and its parallel relationship to the planum sphenoidale.

  II.  Panoramic Zonography (Zonarc)

“Panorama,” as defined in Webster’s new Collegiate Dictionary, is “a comprehensive presentation of a subject” and  “exhibited by being unrolled before the spectator.”  Zonography is a form of conventional tomography in which only the structures in a relatively thick tissue plane (1.0cm) are in focus.  “Zonarc” is the trade name given to a panoramic zonogram produced by a specific manufacturer’s piece of panoramic radiographic equipment.  The dental “Panorex” is a type of panoramic zonogram.

Panoramic zonography (PZ) displays three-dimensional skeletal structures, such as the face and mandible in 2 planes, thereby eliminating superimposition of skeletal parts and providing a more easily understood presentation of complex skeletal anatomy.

The physical limitations of zonographic equipment preclude its use in acute facial/mandibular trauma, including patients with isolated fractures such as simple zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), orbital blow-out, or mandibular or temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injury.  PZ is commonly used for postoperative assessment of facial/mandibular fracture management.

We obtain panoramic zonograms of the midface only in the Caldwell and Waters projections.  These images show the same skeletal anatomy as is demonstrated on their conventional radiographic counterparts, except in much clearer delineation.  A lateral panoramic zonogram of the face is not obtained because it is identical to the lateral conventional radiograph.  Because the skeletal anatomy, or pathology, shown by PZ is limited to that contained in the thickness of the “slice,” PZ should only be used acutely to augment the conventional radiographic study.

  III.  Computed Tomography (CT)

As previously stated, indications for CT of the face include an equivocal conventional radiographic examination or more detailed assessment of facial pathology than shown on conventional radiography.  CT should not be the initial imaging modality for the assessment of mid-facial pathology.

The standard CT protocol of the face include axial and either direct (if the patient’s condition permits), or reconstructed coronal images.  Both soft tissue and bone window images should be printed.

The Memorial Hermann Hospital
FACE CT PROTOCOL
(CT should NOT be the initial study for patients with midface or mandibular trauma.)

Pt. Preparation:

Patient must be cooperative and able to hold still.  Otherwise, the scan should be deferred.
Backboards and other dense materials should not be in the scanning field.

Pt. Position:

Supine for axial scans.
Supine with head dangling over the end of the table for direct coronal scans, if possible.  If not, reformat coronal scans.

Breathing:

Quiet respiration.

IV Contrast:

None.

 

SCANNER
PARAMETERS

Direct Axial

Direct Coronal

Axial CT with Coronal Reformations

Collimation

3 mm (conventional)

3 mm (conventional)

3 mm (conventional)

Table Feed

3 mm feed

3 mm feed

2 mm spacing

Start

Hard palate

Tip of the nasal bone

Hard palate

Stop

Top of frontal sinus

Back wall of sphenoid sinus

Top of frontal sinus

Algorithm

Bone

Bone

Bone

DFOV

19 cm

19 cm

19 cm

Reconstruction
Reformat:

Direct axial and coronal images yield the highest diagnostic quality.  If direct coronal images are not possible due to concern of cervical spine injury or other factor, coronal reconstructions can be made covering the same area as the direct coronals.
Film bone windows only on coronal reformatted images.

 

FILMING

Extent

Window/Level

Special Filming

Soft tissue

Entire scan

450/50

9-on-1

Bone

Entire scan

2000/400

9-on-1

Because facial images are typically printed at 2.5mm slices, the axial images of the face constitute a continuum of anatomy (and pathology) from the maxillary alveolar process, inferiorly, to the supraorbital region, superiorly, and the coronal images from the frontal bone and nose, anteriorly, to the sphenoid and pterygoid bones, posteriorly.  Consequently, the same anatomy (and pathology) will be demonstrated on several consecutive “slices” of the low midface and of the orbits with transitional “slices” showing portions of each.  Obviously, images obtained at different levels through the same area (low midface, orbit) show the same anatomy (pathology) in slightly different perspectives.  Representative axial and coronal CT images have been selected to show the anatomy of the face in each plane.

An axial image through the inferior portion of the maxillary sinuses (Fig. fct01) should show the nasal process of the maxilla; the maxillary antrum and its anterior, posterolateral and medial walls and the zygomatic recess; malar eminence; nasal septum and turbinates; the pterygoid bones; ascending rami of the mandible; and styloid processes, when calcified.

An axial image through the mid-plane of the antrum (Fig. fct02) should show the same structures identified at the lower plane and, in addition, the zygomatic process of the zygomatic arch; the pterygomaxillary fissure separating the posterior wall of the antrum and the pterygoid bone; the mandibular condyle; and the base of the styloid processes.

An axial image through the maxillary-orbital junction (Fig. fct03) is recognized by showing the antero-inferior portion of the orbit anteriorly and the superomedial aspect of the maxillary antrum, posteriorly.  In addition to previously identified anatomic structures an image at this plane should show the entire zygomatic arch or its zygomatic and/or temporal component; the inferior orbital fissure; the sphenoid sinus; and the temporomandibular joints.

Through the mid-orbital plane (Fig. fct04) the axial image should show the nasal bones; ethmoidal sinuses; squamosal portion of the temporal bone; clivus; and the external auditory canals in addition to previously identified structures.

Through a superior orbital plane (Fig. fct05), the axial image should show the nasal bones at the level of the nasion; the lateral wall of the ethmoidal sinuses forming the medial wall of the orbit; and the optic canal.

The anterior-most coronal image (Fig. nct01) would be expected to show the frontal bone and sinuses; nasal bones; and the cartilaginous portion of the nasal septum and alae.

More posteriorly (Fig. cornct01), structures not previously identified that are visible in this plane include the superior orbital rim; the zygomatic process of the frontal bone; ethmoidal sinuses; bony nasal septum and turbinates; the nasal process of the maxilla making the lateral wall of the nares; and the hard palate.

A coronal image through the plane of the orbital rims (Fig. cornct02) should show in addition to previously identified structures, the crista galli; the zygomaticofrontal suture of the lateral orbital rim; the infra-orbital foramen within the inferior orbital rim; the malar eminence; and the anterolateral wall of the antrum (the “friendly line”).

A coronal image through the posterior aspect of the orbit (Fig. cornct03) should be expected to demonstrate the following in addition to the structures previously identified:  the supraorbital foramen; the infra-orbital nerve groove in the orbital floor; and the superomedial aspect of the maxillary sinus (left) or the anomalous ethmoidal air cell (right) that make the superiorly arched density above the medial aspect of the inferior orbital floor on conventional frontal radiographs (Figs. postmed01 & wrts03) ; and the zygomatic arch.

Although successive coronal images posterior to the orbits (Figs. cornct04, 05, 06, 07) show primarily structures of the skull, some portions of the facial skeleton and mandible are included, such as the nasal septum and turbinates; the body and wings of the pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone; the zygomatic arch; and the mandible.

 

NONTRAUMATIC PATHOLOGY

As previously stated, pathology in this primer is purposefully restricted to examples of the classic imaging findings of a few of the common conditions that prompt emergency center patient visits – in this chapter, the midface and mandible.

“Sinusitis” (Fig. wtrs04), a common non-traumatic cause of emergency center visits, frequently requires radiographic evaluation.  Signs of sinusitis may include mucous membrane thickening (edema, inflammation), opacification of paranasal sinuses by fluid which causes an air-fluid level in the involved sinus(es) on erect or cross-table lateral radiographs, and a sharply circumscribed, rounded soft tissue mass, typically in the maxillary sinus, called a mucocoele, retention cyst, or polyp.

 

TRAUMA

Mid-facial fractures can be very difficult to assess by conventional radiography because of the complex facial anatomy, the superimposition of middle and posterior cranial vault skeletal structures, obscuration of facial anatomy by the density of soft tissue swelling and/or blood in the sinuses, particularly the maxillary and ethmoidal, and the number and severity of mid-facial fractures.

Contrary to many appendicular skeletal fractures that follow no distinct pattern, zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) and LeFort fractures do occur in predictable patterns as determined by the relatively heavy struts of mastication.  Therefore, knowledge of these fracture patterns allows one to know where to look for the fracture sites of both ZMC and LeFort fractures.

The most common midface fracture, that of the nose, has been previously presented.  The remaining midface fractures can be understood by means of a simple classification:

Common
unilateral - ZMC
bilateral - LeFort, I, II, III
Uncommon – unilateral fractures of isolated bones
  Blow-out (BOF)
  Lateral orbital rim (“pistol whipped”)
  Zygomatic arch
  Maxillary sinus

Important considerations to the recognition of midface fractures on conventional radiography include:

1)        While the density of soft tissue swelling and/or antral blood may obscure bony detail, it signals the site of injury:  unilateral, ZMC; bilateral, LeFort.

2)       Midface fractures may be indicated only by change of skeletal contour or inappropriate irregularity of a cortical margin. An actual fracture line may not be visible.

3)       The essential element of recognition of mid-facial fractures on conventional frontal radiographs is the status of the “friendly line," eg., the anterolateral wall of the antra, as shown in the following algorithm.

 
4)      
Mid-facial fractures are better conceptualized by conventional radiography than CT.

5)       CT provides more comprehensive delineation of mid-facial fractures than radiography.

Craniofacial fractures are: (a) typically of the skull with upper facial extension; (b) clinically significant from the cranial component and; (c) radiographically apparent.

The Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture (ZMC), commonly incorrectly referred to as “tripod” or “trimalar,” is actually a four-part fracture pattern as seen on conventional frontal radiographs and is currently correctly referred to as “quadruped.”  Conceptually, the fracture pattern is one of an oval or circle with site 1 involving the anterolateral wall of the maxillary antrum (“friendly line”); site 2, the inferior orbital rim (and floor); site 3, the lateral orbital rim (and wall), and; site 4, the zygomatic arch.  This concept is illustrated schematically (Fig. zmcill), by 3D CT (Fig 3dct01 & 3dct02), and clinically in Figs. wtrs01, subment01, fap01, ext_town01, cldwl01.

Schematic representation of the LeFort fractures, as originally described is illustrated in Fig. lefill.  The LeFort I (low mid-face) fracture extends horizontally through each maxillary antrum and nostril above the hard palate (Fig. lfi01).  The LeFort II (pyramidal) extends obliquely vertically from the "friendly lines" to each inferior orbital rim (and floor) to the nasion (Fig. lfii01).  By definition, the LeFort II fracture spares the lateral orbital rims and zygomatic arches.

The original description of the LeFort III, consisted of separation of the face from the skull base, ie., craniofacial disjunction.  As described, the fracture was to involve each zygomatic arch, each lateral orbital rim, and extend through the nasion.  In clinical practice, the LeFort III is “total facial smash,” including fractures in the distribution of all three LeFort fractures (Fig. lfiii01 & lfiii02).

A pure LeFort I may be encountered in clinical practice.  The LeFort II is rarely seen as an isolated injury, being more commonly associated with either a concomitant LeFort I or a ZMC on the side of impaction or all three may occur together (Fig. lfi_ii).

CT shows midface fractures in greater detail than conventional radiography, but requires multiple images to depict the distribution of the fractures and mental integration of those images to conceptualize the type of midface fracture.  Representative axial CT images of a ZMC (Figs. ctzmc02, ctzmc03, ctzmc04, zcorn01, zcorn02) and a LeFort I & II with ZMC are shown in (Figs. lfiizmc1, lfiizmc2, lfiizmc3, lfiizmc4, lfiizmc5, lzcorn1).

Self-test 1:  After having reviewed the above ZMC and LeFort fracture images, you should be able to answer the following questions.

Fracture of the pterygoid bones is occasionally described as intrinsic to all ZMC & LeFort fractures or as being the sine qua non of LeFort fractures.  The reality is that, while the pterygoid bones are fractured in most complex (displaced) ZMC and LeFort II and III fractures, they are not inherently fractured in simple (minimally displaced) ZMC or LeFort I fractures (Fig. ctzmc01).

The Blowout Fracture (BOF) (Figs. zarc01), caused by an abrupt increase in intra-orbital pressure secondary to an object (fist, ball) striking the orbit, is limited to the orbital floor posterior to the intact inferior orbital rim (Figs. fct15, fct13,  fct16).  The fracture occurs along the infra-orbital nerve groove, the weakest part of the orbital skeleton.  The medial floor fragment, which is "hinged" to the medial wall of the orbit, superiorly, and the medial wall of the antrum, inferiorly, is depressed into the antrum to lie in a characteristic inferolateral orientation.  On frontal radiographs, the BOF may be represented by the very thin fragment, a globular soft tissue mass of orbital fat herniated through the fracture defect, or both.  Blood, and consequently opacification of the adjacent antrum or an air-fluid level, is present only if the antral mucoperiosteum is torn. On the lateral radiograph the depressed fragment lies inferior to the contralateral orbital floor (Fig. lat01).  Axial (Fig. fct11) and coronal (Fig. fct12) CT images show the BOF very clearly.

In approximately 50% of floor BOF, the medial orbital wall is fractured concomitantly.  The medial wall fracture is either subtle or unrecognizable on frontal radiographs of the face, but is indicated by orbital emphysema (Fig. orbemph01) which is peculiar to a medial wall fracture and results from air passing through the medial wall defect secondary to increased intra-nasal pressure, as occurs in blowing the nose.

Uncommon fractures of isolated bones of the face include the lateral orbital rim fracture ("pistol-whip" injury, Fig. pist01), the zygomatic arch fracture (Fig. z2, z1), and fracture of the maxillary antrum (Fig. fl1, fl2, fl3).

 

INTRAORBITAL SOFT TISSUE ANATOMY

A mid-axial orbital image (Fig. fct14) should show the globe with its lens separating the anterior and posterior (vitreous) chambers; the medial and lateral recti muscles; the optic nerve; and the region of the lacrimal gland.

A coronal image posterior to the globe (Fig. ctorb01) should show the superior rectus muscle and, immediately inferior to it the superior orbital vein, sometimes referred to as the rectus-venous complex;  the medial, lateral and inferior recti muscles; and the optic nerve.  In each plane, the named structures are made visible by surrounding retrobulbar fat.

 

MANDIBLE

 The mandible is a single U-shaped bone which articulates with the temporal bones bilaterally.  Contrary to an occasionally held misconception, the mandible is not transformed into a closed circle through its articulation with the temporomandibular joints (TMJ).  The significance of this anatomic fact is that the mandible may be fractured at only one site.  Stated differently, one mandibular fracture does not require a second.

 In the absence of clinical evidence of mandibular pathology, the radiographic examination should precede CT.  The mandible is most conveniently radiographically examined by panoramic zonography (PZ).  The advantages of this technique are the 2-dimension display of mandibular anatomy (Fig. zarc02), high sensitivity for mandibular and related structure pathology, particularly fracture fragment alignment, and patient convenience.  The disadvantages include lack of ready availability and frequent inadequate visualization of the TMJs.  For the latter reason, a complete PZ examination of the mandible must also include specific TMJ views with, when possible, the mouth both closed (Fig. tmj01) and open (Fig. tmj02).  The PZ examination clearly shows the mandibular anatomy including the body (symphysis), anteriorly, and, on each side, the horizontal ramus, angle, superior ramus, coronoid process, neck, and condyle.  The latter articulates with the glenoid fossa of the temporal bone to make the temporomandibular joint.  The lateral PZ of the mandible (Fig. lat02) is identical in appearance to the conventional radiographic lateral.

 The conventional radiographic examination of the mandible includes a straight AP (Fig. manap), an oblique view of each side of the mandible (Fig. obl01) and (Fig. obl02), an extended Towne (Fig. towne) and lateral (Fig. lat02) views.  Advantages of the conventional study include universal availability, a general survey of the mandible, and relatively low cost.  Disadvantages include superimposition of other skeletal parts upon the mandible, inability to visualize the mandibular condyles, and difficult patient positioning for the oblique projections.  The oblique views eliminate superimposition of the hemimandibles inherent on the lateral radiograph.

 In addition to the advantages unique to CT previously described, axial CT shows spatial orientation of fragments not recorded by either PZ or conventional radiography and the definitive diagnosis of sagittal fractures of the condyle only suggested by PZ and conventional radiography.


Questions regarding emergency radiology should be directed to Dr. Harris.  Concerns or questions regarding the function or design of this site should be directed to Thea Troetscher, RN.

Copyright © 2000 Harris & Troetscher