|
INTRODUCTION
|
Conventional radiography is the initial
imaging modality of nontraumatic and traumatic conditions of the face because
it is universally available, quickly obtained, an excellent screening examination
that provides comprehensive assessment of the face, is highly sensitive and
specific for facial pathology, and is economical.
Conventional radiography should precede
facial CT in all instances even in the presence of massive facial trauma for
the reasons stated above.
The radiographic examination of the
non-traumatized face should be obtained with the patient erect and all frontal
projections with the central-beam posterior-to-anterior (PA). In patients with facial trauma, other than
isolated to the nose, the examination should be obtained with the patient
supine and the lateral radiograph obtained with a horizontal beam in order
to detect air-fluid levels.
The viewer is again reminded that
this Primer is not intended to replace standard references regarding the
face such as [10],
[11], [12],
[13], [14],
[15].
|
NOSE
|
Routine
Views
|
|||
A.
Supine Waters View
|
|||
|
CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY
|
The antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of the face, in which the petrous pyramids and occiput are superimposed upon the inferior orbital rims and maxillary antra, provides excellent visualization of the superior portions of the medial and lateral orbital rims, including the zygomaticofrontal suture, the superior orbital rim and fissure, the innominate lines (greater sphenoidal wing), and lesser sphenoidal wings, the nasion, the ethmoidal and frontal sinuses, and planum sphenoidale. Limitations of this view are obscuration of the inferior orbital rims and floor, maxillary antra (including the "friendly line"), and malar eminence.
Understanding the relationship of the posteromedial-most aspect of the orbital floor to the inferior orbital rim as seen on the AP & Waters projections is critical to accurate radiologic interpretation. The importance of this relationship lies in the identification of each, the projection-related alteration of this relationship, and the similarity of the normal anatomy to the conventional radiographic signs of a floor blowout fracture. On the straight AP radiograph of the face (Fig. postmed01), the thin, convex bony density in the inferomedial aspect of the orbit is the posteromedial-most aspect of the orbital floor covering the maxillary antrum or an anomalous ethmoidal air cell. The normal variation in the appearance of this structure can be seen by comparing the right and left orbits. The medial aspect of the inferior orbital rim, which is continuous with the inferior orbital rim laterally and the medial orbital wall medially, lies inferior to the posteromedial floor arc.
In changing position from the AP to the Waters projection the head rotates posteriorly on a mid coronal plane which causes the posteromedial floor arc to move inferiorly and the inferior orbital rim superiorly (Fig. wtrs03). On the Waters projection, the floor arc may be misinterpreted as the inferior rim and the latter misinterpreted as a blowout fragment. The inferior orbital foramen, being intrinsic to the inferior rim unequivocally identifies the inferior rim.
The Waters projection, obtained with the neck extended so that the petrous pyramids and occiput are superimposed on the maxillary alveolar process or lower, provides the most comprehensive view of the facial skeleton. With proper radiographic technique and adequate positioning, the Waters projection has as its only limitation inconsistent demonstration of the zygomatic arches.
The extended Towne projection is obtained with the neck flexed and the central beam angulated approximately 35 degrees caudally and centered at the frontoparietal junction. Its principle advantage lies in showing the maxillary antra in a slightly oblique craniocaudad projection (Fig. town01) so that the continuity and configuration of the posterior, lateral, and anterior walls of the antra are clearly evident. The posterolateral wall of the antra may normally be smoothly convex, as in Fig. town01, or undulating. This projection also shows the sphenomaxillary fissure which is the continuum from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the inferior orbital fissure, the base of the greater sphenoidal wing, the ascending ramus, neck, and frequently the condyle of the mandible, as well as the zygomatic arch. Display of the antrum on the Towne projection (Fig. town01) explains the common appearance of the antrum as seen on the AP projection (Fig. wtrs03 ) in which the lateral 1/3 of the antrum, being more dense than the medial 2/3, could be misinterpreted as mucus membrane thickening or a submucosal hematoma. The shorter AP diameter, and air column of the zygomatic recess, compared to that of the body of the sinus cavity (Fig. town01) causes the density of the lateral 1/3 of the sinus to be greater than the body.
The extended Towne view is not designed to show the orbits, ethmoid sinuses, nor cranio-facial region.
The submentovertical ("jug-handle") projection is made, as its name indicates, with the central beam passing from the submental area to the vertex of the skull. Its primary purpose is to show the zygomatic arches in sagittal projection. The arches are normally convex. The zygomaticotemporal suture, normally present in the mid-portion of the arch, may be visible as a smooth, short alteration in contour of the arch. Occasionally, the anterior wall of the antra, the malar eminence, the lateral rim of the orbit and the lateral orbital and posterolateral antral walls may be visable on this projection.
The lateral projection of the face shows the orbital roofs, floors, and lateral rims, the pterygoid bones, posterior antral walls and the interposed pterygomaxillary fissure, the margins of the zygomatic recesses, the hard palate and its parallel relationship to the planum sphenoidale.
II. Panoramic Zonography (Zonarc)
Panorama,
as defined in Websters new Collegiate Dictionary, is a comprehensive
presentation of a subject and exhibited by being unrolled
before the spectator. Zonography is a form of conventional tomography
in which only the structures in a relatively thick tissue plane (1.0cm) are
in focus. Zonarc is the trade name given to a panoramic
zonogram produced by a specific manufacturers piece of panoramic radiographic
equipment. The dental Panorex is a type of panoramic zonogram.
Panoramic zonography (PZ) displays three-dimensional skeletal structures,
such as the face and mandible in 2 planes, thereby eliminating superimposition
of skeletal parts and providing a more easily understood presentation of complex
skeletal anatomy.
The physical limitations of zonographic equipment preclude its use in acute
facial/mandibular trauma, including patients with isolated fractures such
as simple zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), orbital blow-out, or mandibular
or temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injury. PZ is commonly used for postoperative
assessment of facial/mandibular fracture management.
We obtain panoramic
zonograms of the midface only in the Caldwell
and Waters projections.
These images show the same skeletal anatomy as is demonstrated on their conventional
radiographic counterparts, except in much clearer delineation. A lateral
panoramic zonogram of the face is not obtained because it is identical to
the lateral conventional radiograph. Because the skeletal anatomy, or
pathology, shown by PZ is limited to that contained in the thickness of the
slice, PZ should only be used acutely to augment the conventional
radiographic study.
As
previously stated, indications for CT of the face include an equivocal conventional
radiographic examination or more detailed assessment of facial pathology than
shown on conventional radiography. CT should not be the initial imaging
modality for the assessment of mid-facial pathology.
The standard CT
protocol of the face include axial and either direct (if the patients
condition permits), or reconstructed coronal images. Both soft tissue
and bone window images should be printed.
The
Memorial Hermann Hospital
FACE CT
PROTOCOL
(CT should NOT be the initial study for patients
with midface or mandibular trauma.)
|
Pt. Preparation: |
Patient must be cooperative and able to hold still. Otherwise, the scan should be deferred. |
||
|
Pt. Position: |
Supine for axial scans. |
||
|
Breathing: |
Quiet respiration. |
||
|
IV Contrast: |
None. |
||
|
|
Direct
Axial |
Direct
Coronal |
Axial CT
with Coronal Reformations |
|
Collimation |
3 mm (conventional) |
3 mm (conventional) |
3 mm (conventional) |
|
Table Feed |
3 mm feed |
3 mm feed |
2 mm spacing |
|
Start |
Hard palate |
Tip of
the nasal bone |
Hard palate |
|
Stop |
Top of
frontal sinus |
Back wall
of sphenoid sinus |
Top of
frontal sinus |
|
Algorithm |
Bone |
Bone |
Bone |
|
DFOV |
19 cm |
19 cm |
19 cm |
|
Reconstruction |
Direct
axial and coronal images yield the highest diagnostic quality.
If direct coronal images are not possible due to concern of cervical
spine injury or other factor, coronal reconstructions can be made covering
the same area as the direct coronals. |
||
|
|
Extent |
Window/Level |
Special
Filming |
|
Soft
tissue |
Entire
scan |
450/50 |
9-on-1 |
|
Bone |
Entire
scan |
2000/400 |
9-on-1 |
Because
facial images are typically printed at 2.5mm slices, the axial images of the
face constitute a continuum of anatomy (and pathology) from the maxillary
alveolar process, inferiorly, to the supraorbital region, superiorly, and
the coronal images from the frontal bone and nose, anteriorly, to the sphenoid
and pterygoid bones, posteriorly. Consequently, the same anatomy (and
pathology) will be demonstrated on several consecutive slices
of the low midface and of the orbits with transitional slices
showing portions of each. Obviously, images obtained at different levels
through the same area (low midface, orbit) show the same anatomy (pathology)
in slightly different perspectives. Representative axial and coronal
CT images have been selected to show the anatomy of the face in each plane.
An axial image through the inferior portion of the maxillary sinuses (Fig.
fct01) should show the
nasal process of the maxilla; the maxillary antrum and its anterior,
posterolateral and medial walls and the zygomatic recess; malar
eminence; nasal septum and turbinates; the pterygoid bones;
ascending rami of the mandible; and styloid processes, when calcified.
An axial image through the mid-plane of the antrum (Fig. fct02)
should show the same structures identified at the lower plane and, in addition,
the zygomatic process of the zygomatic arch; the pterygomaxillary
fissure separating the posterior wall of the antrum and the pterygoid
bone; the mandibular condyle; and the base of the styloid processes.
An axial image through the maxillary-orbital junction (Fig. fct03) is recognized by showing the antero-inferior portion of the orbit anteriorly and the superomedial aspect of the maxillary antrum, posteriorly. In addition to previously identified anatomic structures an image at this plane should show the entire zygomatic arch or its zygomatic and/or temporal component; the inferior orbital fissure; the sphenoid sinus; and the temporomandibular joints.
Through the mid-orbital plane (Fig. fct04) the axial image should show the nasal bones; ethmoidal sinuses; squamosal portion of the temporal bone; clivus; and the external auditory canals in addition to previously identified structures.
Through a superior orbital plane (Fig. fct05), the axial image should show the nasal bones at the level of the nasion; the lateral wall of the ethmoidal sinuses forming the medial wall of the orbit; and the optic canal.
The anterior-most coronal image (Fig. nct01) would be expected to show the frontal bone and sinuses; nasal bones; and the cartilaginous portion of the nasal septum and alae.
More posteriorly (Fig. cornct01), structures not previously identified that are visible in this plane include the superior orbital rim; the zygomatic process of the frontal bone; ethmoidal sinuses; bony nasal septum and turbinates; the nasal process of the maxilla making the lateral wall of the nares; and the hard palate.
A coronal image through the plane of the orbital rims (Fig. cornct02) should show in addition to previously identified structures, the crista galli; the zygomaticofrontal suture of the lateral orbital rim; the infra-orbital foramen within the inferior orbital rim; the malar eminence; and the anterolateral wall of the antrum (the “friendly line”).
A coronal image through the posterior aspect of the orbit (Fig. cornct03) should be expected to demonstrate the following in addition to the structures previously identified: the supraorbital foramen; the infra-orbital nerve groove in the orbital floor; and the superomedial aspect of the maxillary sinus (left) or the anomalous ethmoidal air cell (right) that make the superiorly arched density above the medial aspect of the inferior orbital floor on conventional frontal radiographs (Figs. postmed01 & wrts03) ; and the zygomatic arch.
Although successive coronal
images posterior to the orbits (Figs. cornct04,
05, 06,
07) show primarily structures
of the skull, some portions of the facial skeleton and mandible are included,
such as the nasal septum and turbinates; the body and wings of the
pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone; the zygomatic arch; and the
mandible.
|
NONTRAUMATIC PATHOLOGY
|
“Sinusitis” (Fig. wtrs04),
a common non-traumatic cause of emergency center visits, frequently requires
radiographic evaluation. Signs of
sinusitis may include mucous membrane thickening (edema, inflammation), opacification
of paranasal sinuses by fluid which causes an air-fluid level in the involved
sinus(es) on erect or cross-table lateral radiographs, and a sharply circumscribed,
rounded soft tissue mass, typically in the maxillary sinus, called a mucocoele,
retention cyst, or polyp.
|
TRAUMA
|
Contrary to many appendicular skeletal
fractures that follow no distinct pattern, zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) and LeFort
fractures do occur in predictable patterns as determined by the relatively
heavy struts of mastication. Therefore, knowledge of these fracture patterns
allows one to know where to look for the fracture sites of both ZMC and LeFort
fractures.
The most common midface fracture,
that of the nose, has
been previously presented. The remaining midface fractures can be understood by means of a
simple classification:
| Common | |
| unilateral - ZMC | |
| bilateral - LeFort, I, II, III | |
| Uncommon – unilateral fractures of isolated bones | |
| Blow-out (BOF) |
|
| Lateral orbital rim (“pistol whipped”) | |
| Zygomatic arch | |
| Maxillary sinus | |
2) Midface fractures may be indicated only by change of skeletal contour or inappropriate irregularity of a cortical margin. An actual fracture line may not be visible.
4) Mid-facial
fractures are better conceptualized by conventional radiography than CT.
Craniofacial fractures are:
(a) typically of the skull with upper facial extension; (b) clinically significant
from the cranial component and; (c) radiographically apparent.
The Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture
(ZMC), commonly incorrectly referred to as “tripod” or “trimalar,” is
actually a four-part fracture pattern as seen on conventional frontal radiographs
and is currently correctly referred to as “quadruped.”
Conceptually, the fracture pattern is one of an oval or circle with
site 1 involving the anterolateral wall of the maxillary antrum (“friendly
line”); site 2, the inferior orbital rim (and floor); site 3, the lateral
orbital rim (and wall), and; site 4, the zygomatic arch.
This concept is illustrated schematically (Fig. zmcill),
by 3D CT (Fig 3dct01
& 3dct02), and
clinically in Figs. wtrs01,
subment01, fap01,
ext_town01, cldwl01.
Schematic representation of the LeFort
fractures, as originally described is illustrated in Fig. lefill. The LeFort I (low mid-face) fracture
extends horizontally through each maxillary antrum and nostril above the
hard palate (Fig. lfi01).
The LeFort II (pyramidal) extends obliquely vertically from
the "friendly lines" to each inferior orbital rim (and floor)
to the nasion (Fig. lfii01).
By definition, the LeFort II fracture spares the lateral orbital
rims and zygomatic arches.
The original description of the LeFort
III, consisted of separation of the face from the skull base, ie., craniofacial
disjunction. As described, the fracture
was to involve each zygomatic arch, each lateral orbital rim, and extend
through the nasion. In clinical
practice, the LeFort III is “total facial smash,” including fractures in
the distribution of all three LeFort fractures (Fig. lfiii01
& lfiii02).
A pure LeFort I may be encountered
in clinical practice. The LeFort
II is rarely seen as an isolated injury, being more commonly associated
with either a concomitant LeFort I or a ZMC on the side of impaction or
all three may occur together (Fig.
lfi_ii).
Self-test 1: After having reviewed the above ZMC and LeFort fracture images, you should be able to answer the following questions.
Fracture
of the pterygoid bones is occasionally described as intrinsic to
all ZMC & LeFort fractures or as being the sine qua non of LeFort fractures.
The reality is that, while the pterygoid bones are fractured in most
complex (displaced) ZMC and LeFort II and III fractures, they are not inherently
fractured in simple (minimally displaced) ZMC or LeFort I fractures (Fig. ctzmc01).
The
Blowout Fracture (BOF) (Figs. zarc01),
caused by an abrupt increase in intra-orbital pressure secondary to an object
(fist, ball) striking the orbit, is limited to the orbital floor posterior
to the intact inferior orbital rim (Figs. fct15,
fct13, fct16).
The fracture occurs along the infra-orbital nerve groove, the weakest
part of the orbital skeleton. The
medial floor fragment, which is "hinged" to the medial wall of
the orbit, superiorly, and the medial wall of the antrum, inferiorly, is
depressed into the antrum to lie in a characteristic inferolateral orientation.
On frontal radiographs, the BOF may be represented by the very thin
fragment, a globular soft tissue mass of orbital fat herniated through the
fracture defect, or both. Blood,
and consequently opacification of the adjacent antrum or an air-fluid level,
is present only if the antral mucoperiosteum is torn. On the lateral radiograph the depressed fragment lies inferior to
the contralateral orbital floor (Fig. lat01).
Axial (Fig. fct11)
and coronal (Fig. fct12)
CT images show the BOF very clearly.
In
approximately 50% of floor BOF, the medial orbital wall is fractured concomitantly. The medial wall fracture is either subtle or
unrecognizable on frontal radiographs of the face, but is indicated by orbital
emphysema (Fig. orbemph01)
which is peculiar to a medial wall fracture and results from air passing
through the medial wall defect secondary to increased intra-nasal pressure,
as occurs in blowing the nose.
Uncommon fractures
of isolated bones of the face include the lateral orbital rim fracture
("pistol-whip" injury, Fig. pist01),
the zygomatic arch fracture (Fig. z2,
z1), and fracture of the
maxillary antrum (Fig. fl1,
fl2, fl3).
|
INTRAORBITAL
SOFT TISSUE ANATOMY
|
A mid-axial orbital image (Fig.
fct14) should show the globe with its lens separating
the anterior and posterior (vitreous) chambers; the medial and
lateral recti muscles; the optic nerve; and the region of the
lacrimal gland.
A coronal image posterior to the
globe (Fig. ctorb01)
should show the superior rectus muscle and, immediately inferior
to it the superior orbital vein, sometimes referred to as the rectus-venous
complex; the medial, lateral
and inferior recti muscles; and the optic nerve. In each plane, the named structures are made
visible by surrounding retrobulbar fat.
|
MANDIBLE
|
Questions
regarding emergency radiology should be directed to Dr.
Harris. Concerns or questions regarding the function or design
of this site should be directed to Thea
Troetscher, RN.
Copyright
© 2000 Harris & Troetscher