UT-Houston Logo
Fact Book logo

 

Fact Book Home<star spacer>Preface<star spacer>Institutional Profile<star spacer>Education<star spacer>Research
Patient Care<star spacer>
Community Service<star spacer>Institutional Development
le
Research
Expenditures by Unit
UT-Health Component Research Expenditures
Expenditures by Sponsoring Agency
Total Proposals & Proposal Dollars
Total Awards & Award Dollars
Grant Proposals by Unit & Type
Contract & Grant Awards by Unit & Type
Contract & Grant Awards by Source
Ratio of Federal Funds to State Appropriated Funds
NIH Awards by Unit
Federal Awards by Agency
Comparison of NIH Award Recipients
Sponsored Project Activity Report
Intellectual Property Activity
Journal Publications
Principal Investigators by Unit
 UT-Houston Home
 Planning Office Home
ft nav
Comparison of NIH Award Recipients
Sources
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Division of Research Grants, Extramural Awards to Domestic Higher Education Institutions, FY 2001

Includes all higher education institutions that received support from the National Institutes of Health. There were 515 rankings in FY 2001.

All grant applications to the NIH are subject to a rigorous peer-review process. Because of this and because NIH is the major funding source for biomedical research, success in obtaining basic science and clinical funding from NIH is an important measure of the quality of an institution and its faculty. Competition for NIH funding has increased dramatically in the past decade, and UT-Houston’s ranking relative to similar institutions is an indicator of the university’s growth in research quality. Since the ranking system used in this survey takes into account total NIH dollars received, institutions with large numbers of faculty tend to rank higher than those with fewer faculty. Given the small number of UT-Houston faculty relative to some of the other universities in this survey, UT-Houston fares well in the comparison.

Comparison of NIH Award Recipients pdf file.

Comparison of NIH Award Recipients
 
Copyright March 2003
Last updated March 2003
For questions or comments contact Dawna Jarvis