Name of student:
Luke B.
Age:
6
Grade:
Kindergarten
School:
G.D. Watson Elementary
Description
Luke B. is a kindergartner. He is a very shy and soft spoken boy
who suffers from asthma. He is a first student, and he has a younger
sister (2 years old). His mother works most evenings as a nurse.
Both of his parents show a great interest in his school performance,
although they do not have time to participate in school activities.
Luke has only one friend from his preschool, and he is hesitant
about breaking into other formed groups or taking initiatives in
his social life. Luke likes school and seems well adjusted. He is
very well behaved, very organized in his school work, follows directions,
and is eager to learn. He learned the letters of the alphabet very
easily and appears to perform well in reading and reading-related
activities. He enjoys looking at story books on his own in the library
corner and writing letters using his own invented spellings. At
the end of the day, he brings home all the letters that he has written
to show to his mother. His teacher's only concern is with his articulation
because he experiences difficulty pronouncing some sounds. For this
reason he was referred for evaluation by a speech pathologist.
Score Interpretation
According to the results of the TPRI screen, Luke seems to need
assistance by setting instructional objectives. However, his scores
on the inventory section contradict this hypothesis by showing a
student without difficulties in phonological processing and also
with adequate confidence in manipulating letters for representing
sounds. According to the inventory tasks, Luke's phonological processing
skills seem to be sufficiently developed. He had difficulties identifying
the letter sounds at the initial screening task and was weak at
blending phonemes. However, his performance in the inventory was
satisfactory, leading to the conclusion that Luke may have needed
some warm-up time. Another explanation for his poor performance
in the screening may be related to his poor articulation and examiner
error. Overall, his scores are consistent with a "false positive"
student profile (i.e., suggesting that he is at-risk but ending
up without problems in learning to read).
Instructional Implications
Luke's scores are contradictory and require a close observation
period. His performance on the inventory section does not justify
extra assistance. However, his poor performance on the screening
prompted his teacher to watch his daily work very closely and reevaluate
him whenever inconsistencies were observed.
TPRI scores
Screening 1 (Beginning of the Year Evaluation)
| Letter Sound Task |
3 of 5 |
Still Developing |
| Blending Onset-Rimes and Phonemes |
4 of 5 |
Still Developing |
Inventory (Middle of the Year Evaluation)
| Book and Print Awareness (Optional Warm Up Activity) |
5 of 5 |
Developed |
| Phonemic Awareness Task 1 (Rhyming) |
5 of 5 |
Developed |
| Phonemic Awareness Task 2 (Blending word parts) |
5 of 5 |
Developed |
| Phonemic Awareness Task 3 (Blending phonemes) |
4 of 5 |
Developed |
| Phonemic Awareness Task 4 (Detecting Initial Sounds) |
4 of 5 |
Developed |
| Phonemic Awareness Task 5 (Detecting Final Sounds) |
3 of 5 |
Still Developing |
| Graphophonemic Knowledge Task 1 (Letter Name Identification) |
26 of 26 |
Developed |
| Graphophonemic Knowledge Task 2 (Letter to Sound Linking) |
9 of 10 |
Developed |
| Listening Comprehension |
5 of 5 |
Developed |
Return to the main Case Studies page.