The University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center
Proteins - Analysis of Structure and Function
Lesson 3.0
Purity Assessment and Storage of Purified Protein
The Third Step
Lesson 3: Purity Assessment and Storage
Proteins - Analysis of Structure and Function
Lesson 3: Purity Assessment and Storage of Purified Protein
Contents:
- Specific Activity
- Ultracentrifugation
- Chromatography
- Electrophoresis
- Immunochemical Reaction
- Heat
- pH
- Light and Physical Treatment
- Chemical Agents
Lesson 3.0 Objectives:
Upon completing Lesson 3 and the practice exercises, the student should be able to:
- Identify methods for assessing purity of a protein preparation
- Evaluate results which may indicate purity using these methods
- Evaluate how much and what kind of evidence of purity is necessary
- Interpret the results of an immunochemical reaction for purity
- Identify common protein denaturing agents
- Identify the pH range tolerated by most proteins
- Relate a chemical agent with its denaturing qualities
A.Purity Assessment
Learning Objectives:
Upon completing this topic and the practice exercises, the student should be able to:
1. Identify methods for assessing purity of a protein preparation
2. Evaluate results which may indicate purity using these methods
3. Evaluate how much and what kind of evidence of purity is necessary
4. Interpret the results of an immunochemical reaction for purity
Assessment of Purity-How Do We Start?
Methods for isolating and purifying proteins were briefly described in Lesson 2. These were primarily preparative methods. Some of these same methods may also be used as analytical methods to determine the purity of the protein we have isolated. The assessment of purity begins by examining the results obtained with the methods described in Lesson 2 plus another method, number 4, below:
1.0 Specific Activity
The specific activity as discussed in Lesson 1 of this tutuorial is an indication of the purity of the protein of interest. It is the ratio of the weight of the protein to the weight of total protein in the same volume of solution. In a very pure solution the ratio would be very near 1. These measurement methods may not be so exact as to give but an indication of the purity.2.0 Ultracentrifugation
As the proteins present in solution are moved by ultracentrifugal force according to the factors described in Lesson 2 it can be observed if there is more than one protein boundary in the Schlieren photograph. If more than one is seen, the protein of interest is not alone. If only one boundary is seen then it is more likely that a pure protein is alone in the solution, but it is not certain. There may be two proteins whose characteristics are similar enough that their sedimentation difference may be undetectable.3.0 Chromatography
The principles employed in the separation of proteins by various chromatographic methods differ. Some of these methods are described in Lesson 2. Proteins may be separated by their molecular size, molecular charge, differential solubility in the stationary and mobile phases, or their affinity to a particular stationary phase component. If the protein is pure, undenatured, and if its polypeptide chains are unseparated (in case of a polymeric protein)only one elution peak should be found using chromatographic methods. A finding of one elution peak obtained by several chromatographic methods (based on different characteristics) tends to increase the probability that the protein preparation is pure. The affinity chromatographic method is a more specific method for the protein of interest if its affinity for another molecule is known.4.0 Electrophoresis
This method has been described in Lesson 2. When only one band or spot is detected by the most sensitive stain following electrophoresis, the likelihood of a pure preparation is good. It could be that a protein of the same size and with the same net charge under one condition of pH could comigrate in the electric field. Therefore, it would be more conclusive of a pure preparation, if one protein band or spot were detected using several electrophoretic methods. One should use zone electrophoresis first. If there is only one protein detected there follow it with acrylamide gel or with isoelectric focusing.5.0 Immunochemical Reaction
The reaction between an antigen and its corresponding antibody is very specific. For this reason, immunochemical reactions are very specific and useful in detecting purity of a protein. When an antigen (our protein in this case) is mixed with an antibody specific to it, aggregation or precipitation occurs. When the reaction occurs in an agar gel, the aggregation may be seen as a precipitin line that forms when an optimal proportion of antibody and antigen have diffused through the agarose and reacted. The location of the precipitin line is related to the size of the antigen molecules as well as the size of the antibody molecules since smaller molecules diffuse faster until their diffusion is halted by the antigen-antibody reaction.If this is a protein that is unknown and uncharacterized, one would need to inject the "pure" protein preparation into an antibody producer (rabbit, pig, goat) using a protocol for the development of a supply of antibodies. It is necessary to withdraw blood from the animal to be injected prior to injection so the serum may be used as a baseline reagent. Once antibodies are produced, the antigen ("pure" protein preparation) and the antibody serum from the animal are examined. A relatively simple method for examination, first described by Ouchterlony, allows the visualization of the presence of one or more proteins in the solution by their identity or non-identity of precipitin lines.
A brief description of the method is outlined below.
- In the procedure outlined here, aseptic technique should be used so that bacteria do not contaminate the agar plates. The use of varying concentrations of antigen is to overcome antigen excess which would cause no precipitin lines to form even in the presence of the appropriate antigen and antibody.
- Two Petri dishes are layered with agarose gel to a depth of about 2-3 mm. Using a hole punch with a diameter of about 0.5 cm, holes are made in the agar in the design shown below
Solutions covering a concentration range between 0.01ug/10 ul and 0.25ug/10ul total protein are placed in the antigen wells 1,2,3,4,5,and 6 in each of the two Petri dishes, A and B. The blood serum taken from the animal prior to injection with the "pure" protein is placed in the antibody well, #7, in Petri dish A . This is the control reaction. The blood serum taken from the animal after antibody formation to the "pure" protein solution is placed in the antibody well, #7, in Petri dish B. The Petri dishes A and B are allowed to sit on a perfectly flat surface for about 24 hours. After that time the dishes A and B are examined for precipitin lines. Interpretation
If Petri Dish A, control:
A. Develops one or more precipitin lines:B. Develops no precipitin lines
- It may be interpreted that the animal already had antibodies to one or more proteins in the "pure protein solution" that was added to the antigen well.
- If precipitin lines are seen, their positions should be compared with those seen on plate B. In this case, it will be very difficult to determine purity using this method.
Any precipitin lines on plate B have meaning.
If Petri Dish B, test:
A. Exhibits precipitin lines
- It is important to note the position of the lines and their congruity.
- The interpretation of these lines is discussed below. B. Exhibits no precipitin lines
- Leave the plate a longer time and examine later.
- No evidence of the antigen antibody reaction could indicate antigen excess, try again with a lower concentration of the "pure" protein solution, or conversely it may indicate that the concentration is too low to be reactive. Review the concentrations that were used and alter the amounts or concentrations of antibody or antigen.
The positions of precipitin lines on Plate B may be interpreted as follows:
- Complete identity
When the precipitin lines from two antigen wells congruently fuse with one another, this is evidence of complete identity. Complete identity is shown (See diagram below) by the protein in wells 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, and 5 and 6.; not by protein in wells 4 and 5 and 6 and 1. It is noted that in some cases the same pattern may occur if two different proteins have the same diffusion characteristics and share common antigenic groups.- Non-identity
If the two antigens are different, their precipitin lines will intersect each other assuming the animal developed antibodies against whatever antigenic proteins were in the "pure" protein solution.In patterns of non-identity the intersecting lines continue to form "spurs". Non identity is shown by the precipitin pattern between wells 4 and 5.- Pattern of partial identity
If there are two proteins present that share a number of common antigenic groups and if the antiserum is capable of reacting with them in the concentrations used, partial identity is exhibited when the precipitin lines intersect but only one line continues past the intersection. See pattern between protein in wells 1 and 6. This pattern may be confused with one of non-identity.If only one line is seen formed between the antibody well and an antigen well regardless of concentration, but particularly in the higher concentrations, the solution of "pure" protein may be considered pure indeed. If there is more than one protein present, and the antibody production is maximal it may be assumed that the other protein would react with the antibody and also produce a precipitin line.
6.0 Summary
In order to ascertain that the isolated protein is pure, its study using specific activity, ion exchange chromatography, steric exclusion chromatography, electrophoresis with different buffers, isoelectric focusing, and reaction with specific antibody are all important. The methods should be based on different characteristics so that the distinction between similar molecules may be made. This discernment of a "contaminant" molecule is improved upon the use of a combination of at least four methods of separation and/or identification. The use of all of them greatly improves the detection of unwanted protein in the preparation.