Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Texas Therapeutics Institute  Intellectual Property/Technology Transfer Considerations
  • Bruce Butler, Ph.D., Vice President
    Office of Technology Management, UTHSC-Houston


  • Chris Capelli, M.D., Vice President Technology Based Ventures, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Rick Friedman, Associate Director Licensing
    Office of Technology Commercialization, UT Austin


2
Tech transfer trends
  • Inter-disciplinary research and collaboration among institutions on the rise
  • Increasing support of tech transfer in Texas as engine for economic development (Texas Emerging Technology Fund, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, Texas Ignition Fund)
  • Maturing of tech transfer capabilities, including standardization of processes


3
Industry will have one point of contact to acquire TTI IP
  • Track record and processes for TTI participants to collaborate on IP
    • Start-ups: 4 recent spinouts of collaborative research (Windmill, Remicalm, Inavonx, NanoMedical Systems)
    •  UTHSC-H,  MDACC and UT-Austin executed over 10 IIA’s for collaborative research inventions.
    • Established processes:  Standard Inter-institutional Agreements (IIA) Terms (as a result of UT System-wide effort led by the 3 TTI participants) and jointly determined operating guidelines for management of particular cases
  • As a result, industry will only need to contact the one UT participant with delegated authority to license UT’s rights for a particular TTI invention.
4
Industry should expect professional, efficient IP licensing from TTI
  • Uniform patent licensing agreement
    • Texas Governor’s office leading an effort to create template patent license
    • TTI participants actively participating/supporting template creation process
  • Emphasis at UT is to get technologies out the door; increasing support from State of Texas, UT System and from within institutions to accomplish that goal.
5
Patent prosecution funding remains a key challenge for TTI commercialization
  • Academic imperative to publish can require early patent filings of potentially promising molecules before industry-credible proof of concept (e.g., animal data)
  • The challenge: how do universities fund worldwide patent prosecution for large numbers of molecules?
6
Conclusion
  • For licensing TTI IP, industry will have one point of contact and should expect professional and efficient treatment.
  • The challenge remains to fund patent prosecution within the university to provide highest value IP rights to industry for those molecules that prove to be commercially promising.